Improving attendance for breast screening among recent non-attenders: a randomised controlled trial of two interventions in primary care

Objectives-To examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two prima ry care based interventions aimed at increasing breast screening uptake for women who had recently failed to attend. Setting-13 General practices with low uptake in the second round of breast screening (below 60%) in north west London and the West Midlands, United Ki ngdom. Participants were women in these practices who were recent non-atten ders for breast screening in the third round. Methods-Pragmatic factorial randomised controlled trial, with people random ised to a systematic intervention (general practitioner letter), an opportu nistic intervention (flag in women's notes prompting discussion by health p rofessionals), neither intervention, or both. Outcome measures were attenda nce for screening 6 months after randomisation and cost-effectiveness of th e interventions. Results-1158 Women were individually randomised as follows: 289 control; 29 1 letter; 290 flag; 288 both interventions. Attendance was ascertained for 1148 (99%) of the 1158 women. Logistic regression adjusting for the other i ntervention and practice produced an odds ratio (OR) for attendance of 1.51 (95% confidence interval (95% CI 1.02 to 2.26; p=0.04) for the letter, and 1.39 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.07; p=0.10) for the flag. Health service costs/addi tional attendance were pound 35 (letter) and pound 65 (flag). Conclusions-Among recent nonattenders, the letter was effective in increasi ng breast screening attendance. The flag was of equivocal effectiveness and was considerably less cost-effective than the letter.