In a collection which refuses to recognize the presence of Marxist contribu
tions to its subject, a number of essays in this book adhere to imperial or
neoclassical economic historiographic traditions, both of which are not ju
st problematic but also revisionist in their approach to the issue of pre-
and post-emancipation forms of unfree labour: Privileging empiricism, and f
or the most part eschewing theory, revisionism attempts to depoliticize ana
lysis of relations such as slavery, indenture and bonded labour in colonial
contexts. Symptomatic examples of this revisionist argument - as applied t
o rural labour in South Africa, India and the Caribbean during the latter p
art of the nineteenth century - are examined and the reasons for their shor
tcomings explored.