Uptake of gas-phase SO2 and H2O2 by ice surfaces: Dependence on partial pressure, temperature, and surface acidity

Citation
Sm. Clegg et Jpd. Abbatt, Uptake of gas-phase SO2 and H2O2 by ice surfaces: Dependence on partial pressure, temperature, and surface acidity, J PHYS CH A, 105(27), 2001, pp. 6630-6636
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
ISSN journal
10895639 → ACNP
Volume
105
Issue
27
Year of publication
2001
Pages
6630 - 6636
Database
ISI
SICI code
1089-5639(20010712)105:27<6630:UOGSAH>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The uptakes of gas-phase SO2 and H2O2 by ice surfaces have been investigate d at temperatures from 213 to 238 K and from 10(-7) to 10(-4) Torr partial pressure. These experiments have been conducted in a low-temperature, coate d-wall flow tube coupled to an electron-impact, quadrupole mass spectromete r which monitors changes in the SO2 and H2O2 partial pressure. The ice surf aces are formed by freezing liquid water. Unlike the uptakes of strong acid s such as HNo3 and HCl, the SO2 and H2O2 uptakes are fully reversible on th e time scale of the experiment and the surface coverages are roughly a thou sandth of a monolayer at 10(-6) Torr partial pressure and 228 K. The SO2 up takes scale with the square root of the partial pressure of the SO2 gas, in dicating that dissociation of the hydrated form of adsorbed SO2 is occurrin g on the surface. The H2O2 uptakes scale linearly with the H2O2 partial pre ssure, indicating that dissociation does not occur. The uptakes are driven by H-bond interactions in this case. Support for these conclusions comes fr om uptake measurements with ice surfaces which were formed by freezing eith er acidic or basic aqueous solutions. Although the H2O2 uptakes are indepen dent of pH, the acidic ice surfaces considerably inhibit the SO2 uptake and the basic surfaces enhance the SO2 uptake. The results in this paper are c onsistent with atmospheric observations which show that both S(IV) and H2O2 have low retention efficiencies after supercooled cloud droplets freeze, w hereas the retention efficiency of HNO3 is high. The uptakes are sufficient ly small that scavenging of SO2 and H2O2 by ice clouds will not be signific ant.