A comparison of the ameroid constrictor versus ligation in the surgical management of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Citation
St. Murphy et al., A comparison of the ameroid constrictor versus ligation in the surgical management of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts, J AM ANIM H, 37(4), 2001, pp. 390-396
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
05872871 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
390 - 396
Database
ISI
SICI code
0587-2871(200107/08)37:4<390:ACOTAC>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Twenty-two dogs were managed surgically for a single extrahepatic portosyst emic shunt; 12 with surgical ligation and 10 with an Ameroid constrictor. U tilization of the Ameroid constrictor significantly decreased surgery time to approximately half that of the ligation technique. A decreased intraoper ative and postoperative complication rate was noted with the Ameroid constr ictor group. Follow-up evaluation demonstrated comparable efficacy when com paring surgical techniques. The Ameroid constrictor offered a surgical occl usion technique for management of a single extrahepatic portosystemic shunt that was equally effective to ligation while shortening surgical time and minimizing the risks that are commonly associated with ligation of the shun ting vessel.