Comparison of 3 surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A nonrandomized, background matched analysis

Citation
K. Suzuki et al., Comparison of 3 surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A nonrandomized, background matched analysis, J UROL, 166(2), 2001, pp. 437-443
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00225347 → ACNP
Volume
166
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
437 - 443
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(200108)166:2<437:CO3SAT>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Purpose: To clarify the characteristics of surgical approaches to laparosco pic adrenalectomy we performed background matched analysis of clinical outc omes of the 3 approaches. Materials and Methods: From February 1992 to July 2000 we performed 118 lap aroscopic adrenalectomies in 115 patients with adrenal tumors. For these op erations we used the anterior transperitoneal approach in 46 patients, the lateral transperitoneal approach in 32 and the lateral retroperitoneal appr oach in 40. Results: To exclude the learning curve effect we eliminated our initial 20 patients treated with the anterior transperitoneal approach. To allow backg round matching of the 3 groups we also excluded 14 patients with tumors mor e than 5 cm., 6 who underwent conversion to open surgery and 1 patient who required 5 days of bed rest for retroperitoneal hematoma caused by bleeding from a trocar port. The final analysis included 16, 25 and 36 cases manage d via the anterior transperitoneal, lateral transperitoneal and lateral ret roperitoneal approach, respectively. Average operative time was significant ly shorter for the lateral transperitoneal approach. Postoperative recovery was not significantly different in the lateral transperitoneal and lateral retroperitoneal groups. Postoperative complications included mild paralyti c ileus in 2 patients and shoulder tip pain, probably peritoneal irritation due to carbon dioxide insufflation and bowel preparation, in 4 in the tran speritoneal groups. Our results imply that the easiest procedure is the lat eral transperitoneal approach but the lateral retroperitoneal approach is s lightly less invasive. Conclusions: Although it is important to remember that this study was not a prospective randomized trial and, thus, had from certain biases, we believ e that if a tumor is more than 5 cm. and/or the surgeon is not yet skilled in laparoscopic adrenalectomy, the lateral transperitoneal approach is the most suitable method. If the surgeon has performed at least 20 operations, the adrenal tumor is unilateral and the lesion is less than 5 cm., the late ral retroperitoneal approach seems to be more suitable because of its minim ally invasive nature. The lateral retroperitoneal approach is also preferre d in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery. With improvements in technique and new instruments the time required for the lateral retroper itoneal approach has been significantly decreased.