Prospective evaluation of hot flashes during treatment with parenteral estrogen or complete androgen ablation for metastatic carcinoma of the prostate

Citation
Ac. Spetz et al., Prospective evaluation of hot flashes during treatment with parenteral estrogen or complete androgen ablation for metastatic carcinoma of the prostate, J UROL, 166(2), 2001, pp. 517-520
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00225347 → ACNP
Volume
166
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
517 - 520
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(200108)166:2<517:PEOHFD>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the incidence and frequency of, and distress due to h ot flashes after castration therapy with polyestradiol phosphate and comple te androgen ablation. Materials and Methods: A total of 915 men with metastatic prostate carcinom a enrolled in the Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group-5 trial study were ra ndomized to intramuscular injections of 240 mg. Polyestradiol phosphate eve ry 2 weeks for 8 weeks followed by monthly subcutaneous injections or compl ete androgen ablation, that is bilateral orchiectomy or 3.75 mg. of the gon adotropin-releasing hormone analog triptorelin monthly combined with 250 mg . of the antiandrogen flutamide 3 times daily. The incidence and frequency of, and distress due to hot flashes were recorded at regular intervals usin g a questionnaire. Results: Of the 915 men 901 were evaluated at a median followup of 18.5 mon ths. The incidence of hot flashes was 30.1% and 74.3% in the polyestradiol phosphate and complete androgen ablation groups, respectively (p <0.001). I n the polyestradiol phosphate group the frequency of and distress due to ho t flashes were significantly lower than in the androgen ablation group. The re was complete relief from hot flashes in 50% of the men on polyestradiol phosphate during followup compared with none on androgen ablation. The inci dence of hot flashes did not differ in men with and without tumor progressi on. Conclusions: Endocrine treatment with polyestradiol phosphate induced fewer and less distressing hot flashes than complete androgen ablation. Flashes also disappeared to a greater extent during polyestradiol phosphate than du ring androgen ablation. The data in this study enable us to provide thoroug h individual information to patients on the risk and grade of expected dist ress and duration of hot flashes during polyestradiol phosphate or complete androgen ablation treatment.