Zonal planning systems are not noted for their promotion of land-use divers
ification or variety; rather, the rigidity with which they regulate changes
in land-use has been a focus of concern in many countries. Zones frequentl
y cut across areas of diverse social, cultural and economic need; they caus
e sharp divisions in both physical structure and social equity. In some cou
ntries, the creation of "buffer" or "mixed use" zones has been viewed as on
e possible solution; these can blunt the edges of otherwise sharp spatial d
ivisions and promote diversity. Elsewhere, there have been calls for greate
r local discretion in the planning process and a shift in power away from t
he strategic level towards the local state. This paper explores the possibi
lity of introducing such a system in Korea. It considers some of the proble
ms that have stemmed from rigid zoning using the example of recent moves to
amend "restricted development zone" boundaries. It then offers two paths f
or change: the extension of existing powers to give local authorities great
er discretion in planning decisions, or the introduction of discretionary p
lanning zones as a standard and widely available regulatory tool. (C) 2001
Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.