A look at the thermodynamics of the association of amphiphilic polyelectrolytes in aqueous solutions: Strengths and limitations of isothermal titration calorimetry
Bb. Raju et al., A look at the thermodynamics of the association of amphiphilic polyelectrolytes in aqueous solutions: Strengths and limitations of isothermal titration calorimetry, LANGMUIR, 17(14), 2001, pp. 4416-4421
The dissolution in water of the sodium salts of poly(2-acrylamido)-2-methyl
propanesulfonic acid (PAMPS), N,N-di-n-octadecyl-endcapped-poly(2-acrylamid
o)-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid [(C-18)(2)-PAMPS], cholesteryl-endcapped-po
ly( 2-acrylamido)-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (Chol-PAMPS), and a random c
opolymer of AMPS and N-dodecylmethacrylamide (PAMPS-Dod(20)) was studied by
isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The endcapped polymers form multim
olecular aggregates in aqueous solutions. The concentration range for aggre
gation and the enthalpy of micellization were determined as functions of th
e electrolyte concentration (0.01 M < [NaCl] < 0.3 M) and temperature (288
K < T < 308 K) for solutions of (C-18)(2)-PAMPS. At 298 K and 0.2 M NaCl, a
ggregation of this amphiphilic polyelectrolyte occurs in solutions with con
centrations ranging from about 1 to 14 mmol of AMPS L-1 (0.5-2.7 gL(-1))wit
h an enthalpy of micellization of similar to 100 J (mol of AMPS)1. The effe
ct of the experimental conditions, such as the method of preparation of the
polymer stock solution and its concentration, on the ITC results is descri
bed in the case of Chol-PAMPS. Titrations performed with poly( sodium-2-acr
ylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate) (PAMPS) confirmed that PAMPS does not ag
gregate in aqueous NaCl, whereas PAMPS-Dod(20) forms predominantly unimolec
ular micelles. The advantages and limitations of ITC for studying the micel
lization thermodynamics of amphiphilic polyelectrolytes are discussed.