Objectives/Hypothesis: The wound healing characteristics of incisions made
with the short pulsed CO(2)laser tuned to 9.55 mum versus the traditional 1
0.6 mum were investigated. Previous studies have shown that at 9.55 mum, co
llagen is targeted more selectively than at 10.6 mum, which results in decr
eased acute thermal injury patterns. This study investigates the difference
in wound healing over time between lasers and compares laser incisions wit
h cold knife techniques. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial using a
porcine model. Methods: Tissue from 10.6-mum and 9.55-mum incisions of 10 p
iglets was evaluated with histological analysis and tensiometry at 3, 7, 14
, and 21 days postoperatively, A Bonferroni-Dunn corrected analysis of vari
ance analysis at a 95% significance level was used to compare the effect of
wavelength. Results: The results demonstrate that although knife incisions
are consistently stronger than laser incisions, the 9.55-mum CO2 laser inc
isions are no stronger than incisions made with the conventional 10.6-mum l
aser. Furthermore, histological analysis shows no difference in lateral the
rmal damage between lasers at 3, 7, 14, and 21 days postoperatively. The pr
ogression of collagen formation and inflammation does not differ over time.
Conclusion: This study of wound healing using a porcine model demonstrates
that the 9.55-mum CO2 laser does not demonstrate an improvement in wound h
ealing over the traditional 10.6-mum CO2 laser. These results may be second
ary to the common:explosive vaporization mechanism produced by both lasers
in the infrared spectrum.