Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging

Citation
J. Manhart et al., Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging, OPER DENT, 26(4), 2001, pp. 357-366
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY
ISSN journal
03617734 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
357 - 366
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-7734(200107/08)26:4<357:MQOTRI>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
This in vitro study compared the proximal marginal adaptation of direct com posite restorations with composite and ceramic inlays inserted with differe nt resin cements. Standardized MOD Class II inlay cavities with one proxima l box extending below and the other above the CEJ were cut in 48 extracted human molars and randomly assigned to six groups (n=8). Incrementally layer ed direct composite restorations (P60), composite inlays (P60) and ceramic inlays (Empress; Cerec Vitablocs Mark II) were placed in the cavities. Thre e different resin cements (RelyX ARC; Variolink II high viscosity; Panavia 21) were used for luting the composite inlays. All ceramic inlays were ceme nted with RelyXARC. After finishing and polishing, the teeth were stored fo r 24 hours in Ringer solution at 37 degreesC before they were subjected to thermal and mechanical loading (5/55 degreesC, 2000x; 50 N vertical load, 5 0000x). Margins were evaluated on epoxy replicas using a scanning electron microscope at X200 magnification. Statistical analysis was performed with n on-parametric test methods (alpha =0.05). The adhesive interfaces to enamel exhibited high percentages of perfect margins for all groups (91.8% to 96% ) and a maximum of 5.2% marginal gap formation. Dentin-limited cavity segme nts demonstrated more marginal openings and less perfect margins than ename l-bound areas; however, this was only statistically significant for direct composite restorations and composite inlays inserted with Variolink II and Panavia 21. RelyXARC showed a significantly better adaptation to P60 inlays compared with the leucite-reinforced Empress ceramic but not the Vitablocs Mark II ceramic.