Marginal adaptation of four resin composites, Clear-fil APX, Estelite, Silu
x Plus and Z-100 cured with two irradiation methods (soft-start or high-pow
er start) of a commercial soft-start halogen lamp unit (Elipar Highlight) w
ere evaluated by measurement of the wall-to-wall contraction gap width. One
-hundred and sixty cylindrical cavities, 3 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm in dep
th, were prepared in extracted human molars. The 80 cavity walls were treat
ed with the Megabond system and each 20 cavities were filled with one of fo
ur resin composites. Then, each 10 fillings were irradiated by the soft-sta
rt method (soft-power light for 10 seconds followed by high-power light for
30 seconds) or high-power light for 40 seconds. The other 80 cavity walls
were treated with an experimental bonding system consisting of 0.5M EDTA as
a conditioner, 35% glyceryl mono-methacrylate as a primer and Clearfil Pho
to Bond as a bonding agent. The cavities were restored with the four resin
composites and two irradiation methods, the same as the Megabond group. The
contraction gap was measured with a Light microscope and expressed in % of
the cavity diameter. In addition, the curing capability of these two light
sources was evaluated by measurement of the curing depth of the four resin
composites using a split Teflon mold 4 mm in inner-diameter and 8 mm in he
ight. Marginal gap formation of Clearfil APX, Estelite and Silux Plus with
the experimental bonding system was completely prevented regardless of the
kind of irradiation methods used. The deterioration of marginal adaptation
caused by the Megabond system could not be improved by use of the soft-star
t method programmed in Elipar Highlight.