Purpose. To examine the effect of normal aging on visual field sensitivity
and identify the best-fitting function for normal populations. Methods. Ful
l Threshold standard automated perimetry data (program 24-2, Humphrey Field
Analyzer) was collated retrospectively from clinically normal subjects who
had previously been recruited for studies of normal visual function. One e
ye of each subject was randomly selected for analysis. Linear, bilinear, an
d simple nonlinear candidate functions of mean sensitivity vs, age (indepen
dent variable) were applied to these cross-sectional population data. Diffe
rences in the aging effect by eccentricity and hemifield were also consider
ed. Results. Data from 562 normal eyes were available for analysis. A signi
ficant negative relationship existed between age and mean visual field sens
itivity within the cross-sectional population data. Coefficients of determi
nation for the linear, bilinear, and nonlinear functions were 0.21, 0.20, a
nd 0.26, respectively, indicating that the nonlinear function provided best
characterization of the effect of age on mean sensitivity. A small but sig
nificant increase in the aging effect was present both peripherally (p < 0.
001) and superiorly (p < 0.001). Discussion. The nonlinear function that pr
ovided the best fit to cross-sectional population data indicates that age e
xerts an increasing effect on perimetric sensitivity with age, which has im
plications for clinical devices that use linear age coefficients to correct
for normal aging effects. A linear age correction will overestimate aging
changes for younger subjects and, therefore, may miss early pathologic chan
ges in visual sensitivity. Conversely, linear age correction will also unde
restimate aging changes for older subjects and, thus, may overcall patholog
ical sensitivity loss in this group. The effect of age within subjects requ
ires further investigation to provide reliable estimates of the effect of a
ge on sensitivity.