This article begins with an examination of two spectacles from the end of t
he nineteenth century which represent the emancipated 'Negro:' the Tennesse
e Centennial Exposition and Saint-Gauden's Shaw Memorial in Boston. There a
re important difference, not least in the significance of their locations.
In the North, the black is a free citizen, while the Jim Crow South denies
the status granted by the Fourteenth Amendment. This model of good North ve
rsus bad South is not taken at face value, however, for underpinning both s
pectacles are shared beliefs. In both, the black citizen is constructed acc
ording to a white ideal of black labour; in both, this coalescence of class
and race is founded on the same concern for laissez-faire economics and it
s role in bringing about white unity; and both, nostalgia works to reify th
e past between black and white Americans. This article ends by introducing
a third spectacle: the lynching. This points to a further common feature of
these visual events: all circumscribe the recognition of the black as subj
ect, and thus mark the limits of black citizenship. In spite of the very di
fferent idioms of racism, all share a belief that the abstract freedom gran
ted by the Constitution is necessarily limited by concrete social and natur
al formations. The free black North and the unfree black in the Jim Crow So
uth are, in Adorno's famous phrase, 'torn halves of an integral freedom to
which they do not add up'. Black citizenship is denied by the very gesture
that offers it.