T. Ito et al., GI side-effects of a possible therapeutic GRF analogue in monkeys are likely due to VIP receptor agonist activity, PEPTIDES, 22(7), 2001, pp. 1139-1151
Growth hormone (GH) is used or is being evaluated fbr efficacy in treatment
of short stature, aspects of aging, cardiac disorders, Crohn's disease, an
d short bowel syndrome. Therefore, we synthesized several stable growth hor
mone-releasing factor (GRF) analogues that could be therapeutically useful.
One potent analog, [D-Ala(2),Aib(8,18)Ala(9, 15, 16, 22, 24-26.)Gab(27)]hG
RF(1-27)NH2 (GRF-6), with prolonged infusion caused severe diarrhea in monk
eys; however, it had no side-effects in rats. Because GRF has similarity to
VIP/PACAP and VIPomas cause diarrhea, this study investigated the ability
of this and other CRF analogues to interact with the VIP/PACAP receptors. R
at VPAC(1)-R (rVPAC(1)-R), human VPAC(1)-R (hVPAC(1)-R), rVPAC(2)-R and hVP
AC(2)-R stably transfected CHO and PANC 1 cells were made and T47D breast c
ancer cells containing native human VPAC(1)-R and AR4-2J cells containing P
AC(1)-R were used. hGRF(1-29)NH2 had low affinity for both rVPAC(1)-R and r
VPAC(2)-R while VIP had a high affinity for both receptors. GRF-6 had a low
affinity for both rVPAC(1)-R and rVPAC(2)-R and very low affinity for the
rPAC(1)-R. VIP had a high affinity, whereas hGRF(1-29)NH, had a low affinit
y for both hVPAC(1)-R and hVPAC(2)-R. In contrast GRF-6, while having a low
affinity for hVPAC(2)-R, had relatively higher affinity for the hVPAC(1)-R
. In guinea pig pancreatic acini, all GRF analogues were full agonists at t
he VPAC1-R causing enzyme secretion. These results demonstrate that in cont
rast to native hGRF(1-29)NH2 GRF-6 has a relatively high affinity for the h
uman VPAC(1)-R but not for the human VPAC(2)-R, rat VPAC(1)-R, rat VPAC(2)-
R or rat PAC(1)-R. These results suggest that the substituted GRF analog, G
RF-6, likely causes the diarrheal side-effects in monkeys by interacting wi
th the VPAC(1)-R. Furthermore, they demonstrate significant species differe
nces can exist for possible therapeutic peptide agonists of the VIP/PACAP/G
RF receptor family and that it is essential that receptor affinity assessme
nts be performed in human cells or from a closely related species. (C) 2001
Published by Elsevier Science, Inc.