The objective of this study was to confirm electrophysiologically both the
presence and course of uraemic neuropathy in haemodialysis patients. Nerve
conduction studies of the lower extremities were done in 70 haemodialysis p
atients and 20 normal volunteers. Compared with that in normal volunteers,
the distal motor latency in the tibial nerve of patients was prolonged sign
ificantly (p <0.05), and the minimal F wave latency in the tibial nerve was
also prolonged significantly (p <0.05). Motor conduction velocity in the t
ibial nerve was reduced significantly (p <0.05), and sensory nerve conducti
on velocity in the medial plantar nerve also was reduced significantly (p <
0.05). These results suggest the presence of uraemic neuropathy in haemodia
lysis patients. Twenty patients were investigated by a follow up study five
years later. Parameters from F wave conduction studies, which were thought
to be the most useful in the evaluation of neuropathy, showed no significa
nt differences between the initial and follow up trials. These observations
suggest that uraemic neuropathy does not progress during haemodialysis. Th
ese results also suggest that most haemodialysis patients showed electrophy
siological evidence of uraemic neuropathy, but no remarkable electrophysiol
ogical change in uraemic neuropathy during haemodialysis was recognised.