Medical and economic evaluation of organ transplantation in France, with an application to liver transplantation

Citation
F. Fourquet et al., Medical and economic evaluation of organ transplantation in France, with an application to liver transplantation, REV EPIDEM, 49(3), 2001, pp. 259-272
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE
ISSN journal
03987620 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
259 - 272
Database
ISI
SICI code
0398-7620(200106)49:3<259:MAEEOO>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background: Organ transplantation is an expensive and risky medical procedu re. Estimating the cost is difficult because the care is complex and involv es many actors. We present a methodological framework for the economic eval uation of organ transplantation in France which include a detailed collecti on of all the direct costs and the simultaneous analysis of health status. it was applied to evaluate the cost of liver transplantation in France. Methods: All consecutive adults transplanted or placed on the waiting list of liver transplantation in the Department of Surgery of Cochin Hospital, P aris, between 1994 and 1996 were included. All resource use was measured du ring one year: staff wages, pharmacy and blood, laboratory and radiology su pplies, overhead hospital services. Mean quality of life was estimated by t he survival weighted by the Karnofsky index. Results : Transplantation: 38 patients were included. The first year mean c ost after transplantation was 561,000FF (included rehospitalisations cost o f 120,000FF). Care outside the hospital induced 10% of the total cost. Mean quality of life was 63% (from 0% to 93%) and increased with rime, whereas cost decreased. Waiting list: 26 of 33 patients on waiting list were transp lanted. The first year mean cost was 95,000FF (included 32,000FF for first evaluation) and increased with time. 44% of cost was supported by another h ospital than the transplanting one. Sickness allowance added 20% to the cos t. The mean quality of life was 56% during the first year. Conclusions: This complete approach of organ transplantation cost respected the medical procedure over the rime. Detailed costs take into account the care outside the hospital. This method can be used in other countries and g eneralised to all surgical or medical procedure as heavy as the organ trans plantation.