Psychological intervention influences the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in patients with stress-related symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease
T. Kamolz et al., Psychological intervention influences the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in patients with stress-related symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, SC J GASTR, 36(8), 2001, pp. 800-805
Background: Psychological aspects such as stress, emotions, illness behavio
ur or personality are known to affect the severity of symptoms of gastroeso
phageal reflux disease (GERD) and can influence medical outcome in some pat
ients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of psychol
ogical intervention within routine surgical care on the surgical outcome of
laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) in patients with stress-ralated GER
D symptoms during a I-year follow-up. Methods: Out of a sample of 196 conse
cutive patients who required LAPS (Nissen fundoplication), a group of 89 (4
5%) believed that stress was a factor in the cause of their symptoms (stres
s-related versus stress-unrelated GERD patients). Patients with stress-rela
ted symptoms were randomly assigned to the psychological intervention (PI g
roup; n =32) or control group with routine surgical care (RC group; n=42).
Five patients were excluded from the study. Assessments of surgical outcome
were: objective clinical data such as DeMeester score or lower oesophageal
sphincter pressure, Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life index (GIQLI), evalua
tion of potential side effects such as subjective degree of dysphagia, gene
ral impairment as a result of LAPS, and patient satisfaction with surgery.
Results: There were no significant differences in objective clinical data b
etween the different treatment groups before and after surgery. Before surg
ery, patients with stress-related symptoms had a lower GIQLI and an increas
ed spectrum of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms compared with patients withou
t stress-related symptoms. A significant impact (P < 0.05-0.01) of psycholo
gical intervention on quality-of-life data, especially in GI symptoms, degr
ee of dysphagia and general impairment, could be calculated after surgery.
No differences in satisfaction with therapy were detectable. Comparing outc
ome, no significant differences between patients without stress-related GER
D symptoms: and the PI group were found. Generally, quality-of-life data in
all patients improved significantly and patient satisfaction was excellent
or good in 98.9% one year after surgery. In two patients a laparoscopic re
fundoplication was neccessary because of a 'slipping Nissen'. Conclusions:
These findings indicate that there is no impact of psychological interventi
on on objective clinical data. Patients with stress-related GERD symptoms p
rofit significantly from psychological intervention in patient-related fact
ors of surgical outcome such as quality of life or degree of several aspect
s such as dysphagia and general impairment. Generally, LARS in patients wit
h stress-related GERD symptoms is an effective and safe procedure which imp
roves quality of life with fewer side effects. Psychological intervention r
educes non GERD-related GI symptoms and makes the outcome comparable to the
outcome of patients without stress-related symptoms. We therefore suggest
that surgical treatment alone in patients with stress-related GERD symptoms
is incomplete and that psychological intervention can optimize surgical ou
tcome in these patients.