Effect of a controlled-release urea supplementation on feed intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and ruminal kinetics of sheep fed low quality tropical forage

Citation
Dc. Puga et al., Effect of a controlled-release urea supplementation on feed intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and ruminal kinetics of sheep fed low quality tropical forage, SMALL RUMIN, 41(1), 2001, pp. 9-18
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09214488 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
9 - 18
Database
ISI
SICI code
0921-4488(200107)41:1<9:EOACUS>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Four ruminally cannulated crossbred sheep (25 +/- 3.3 kg BW) were divided i nto a 4 x 4 Latin square design to measure the effects of controlled-releas e urea supplement (CRUS). The basal diet consisted of 60% sugar cane tops ( Saccharum officinarum), 30% full plant corn stubble (Zea mays), and 10% Kin g grass (Pennisetum purpureum). Feed intake, digestibility, N balance and i n situ ruminal kinetics were studied with four diets, D1 (control), D2, D3 and D4, which included the ratios of 100:0%, 90:10%, 80:20% or 70:30% of ba sal diet with CRUS. Results showed DMI differences (P < 0.05) for D4 (822 g per day) versus D1, D2 and D3 (580, 659 and 700 g per day, respectively). N retention increased (P < 0.05) for D4 (35.69 g per day) versus D1, D2 and D3 (9.29, 6.85 and 19.10 g per day, respectively). In vivo N digestibility was greater (P < 0.05) in D4 (79.63%) than in D1 (57.57%). In vivo digesti bility of DM, OM, GE, cellulose and hemicellulose was similar among the fou r groups. Digestibility of cell walls in D4 was higher (P < 0.05) at 74.06% versus 67.78% in D1. In situ DM digestibility showed differences (P < 0.05 ) among all diets at 9, 12, 24 and 48 h of incubation. Potentially digestib le fiber, 52.61%, was higher (P < 0.05) in D4 versus 31.00% in D1. Indigest ible fiber, 35.29%, was lowest (P < 0.05) in D4 compared to 81.51% in D1, D igestion rate constant (kd) was different (P < 0.05) between the experiment al diets and control. Passage constant (k(p)) was different (P < 0.05) betw een all diets (0.036/h in D4 to 0.081/h in D1). True digestibility was high er (P < 0.05) in D4 (44.64%) compared to D1 (19.55%), but in D2 (24.54%) an d D3 (28.22%) there was no difference. Cellulose in situ digestion rate, th e potentially digestible fiber, was higher (P < 0.05) in D3 (42.74%) as com pared to D1 (22.50%). Time of disappearance of cellulose in D4 (14.79 h) wa s less (P < 0.05) than in D1 (24.03 h), however there was no difference bet ween D1 and D2. Hemicellulose in situ digestion was different (P < 0.05) be tween D3 (45.48%) and D1 (23.61%). Digestion rate was higher (P < 0.05) bet ween D3 and DI as compared to D1. Passage rate was different (P < 0.05) bet ween D4 (0.033/h) and D1 (0.018/h). True digestibility in D3 (34.84%) and D 4 (34.62%) was higher (P < 0.05) than that in D1 (20.06%) and D2 (25.86%), Half-time disappearance (t(1/2)) for hemicellulose was higher (P < 0.05) in D1 (62.36 h) than in D3 (28.00 h) and D4 (20.64 h). This study demonstrate d that low quality forages at 70% of the total diet can be efficiently util ized by sheep when controlled-release urea supplementation is 30% of the fe eding regime. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.