Knowledge of soil wafer characteristics, such as soil hydraulic conductivit
y, soil erodibility, and soil water retention, are required for the applica
tion of a surface hydrology model in south Florida. However these data are
limited for the soils of south Florida. Also, there are no standard methods
for determining soil hydraulic properties such as saturated hydraulic cond
uctivity, erodibility, and water retention values. The objectives of this s
tudy were: 1) to calculate soil erodibility using results from rainfall sim
ulation; 2) to compare different methods for calculating soil hydraulic con
ductivity, soil erodibility, and soil water retention values; and 3) to eva
luate how the results from these different methods would affect evapotransp
iration, storm water runoff, crop growth, and soil erosion in the model. Th
ree typical soils from the region were used for this study: Krome (sandy lo
am, moderately well drained), Chekika (silty clay loam, poorly drained), an
d Perrine Marl (sandy loam, very poorly drained). field research (including
model calibration and rainfall simulation) was used to determine soil wate
r parameters. While using various methods to determine soil parameters (cal
ibrated, measured, and estimated) in a hydrologic model, significant discre
pancies of simulated hydrologic variables were observed. Therefore, caution
should be exercised when predicting critical parameters for hydrologic mod
els. If a model, such as the Everglades Aaro-Hydrology Model (EAHM), is use
d for comparison of different management practices, slight errors in estima
ted parameters are acceptable. However if the model is used to assess possi
ble changes in the hydrologic regime of south Florida, the accuracy of simu
lated values is important and in need of further investigation.