Research on propositional reasoning (involving 'theory of mind' understandi
ng) in adult patients with aphasia reveals that reasoning can proceed in th
e absence of explicit grammatical knowledge. Conversely, evidence from stud
ies with deaf children shows that the presence of such knowledge is not suf
ficient to account for reasoning. These findings are in keeping with recent
research on the development of naming, categorization and imitation, indic
ating that children's reasoning about objects and actions is guided by infe
rences about others' communicative intentions. We discuss the extent to whi
ch reasoning is supported by, and tied to, language in the form of conversa
tional awareness and experience rather than grammar.