A comparative mechanical study of 3 external fixator clamps

Objective-To compare external fixator clamps from Kirschner-Ehmer (K-E), Sy nthes, and Meynard with respect to 6 mechanical parameters. Study Design-A bench test of mechanical properties. Methods-Specially designed fixtures were used to mechanically test 6 clamps of each type at 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 Newton-Meters of clamp bolt-tightening t orque. Results-Components slipped axially and torsionally in the K-E clamp at high er forces for all parameters except fur clamp bolt axis pivot. No bolt axis pivot occurred with the Synthes clamp. Instead, the damp plastically defor med at the fixator-pin interface, This failure occurred at a higher applied torque than the pivot torque for other clamps. The Meynard clamp withstood significantly greater force than the K-E clamp when torsion was applied to the clamp bolt axis in the clockwise direction. Pivot forces for the K-E c lamp were significantly higher than the Meynard clamp in the counterclockwi se direction. Conclusions-Overall, the K-E clamp was able to resist higher axial and tors ional forces before slipping than the Meynard clamp or the Synthes clamp. T he Synthes clamp was best able to resist torsion around the clamp bolt axis . Torsional resistance at the clamp-fixator pin and clamp-connecting bar in terface was the weakest parameter of clamp mechanics. Clinical Relevance-The ability to resist motion within a clamp is related t o fracture-reduction stability. Knowledge of the mechanical properties of f ixator clamps will improve a clinician's ability to apply rigid fixation. ( C) Copyright 2001 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.