After examining the rhetoric of the network broadcast coverage on election
night 2000. it is concluded that although individual "decision desk" call t
imes were nor identical across networks, there was a consistent pattern of
correct and incorrect calls. The language of the election night broadcasts
undercut network credibility on two counts. First, the networks largely fai
led to acknowledge their common reliance on the Voter News Service for thei
r information creating the impression that independent research by the five
different networks war producing identical calls. Second, the networks fai
led to adequately describe how the calls were being made and the limitation
s of predictive models in a close election.