Social influences, social norms, social support, and smoking behavior among adolescent workers

Citation
P. Fagan et al., Social influences, social norms, social support, and smoking behavior among adolescent workers, AM J H PRO, 15(6), 2001, pp. 414-421
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION
ISSN journal
08901171 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
414 - 421
Database
ISI
SICI code
0890-1171(200107/08)15:6<414:SISNSS>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Purpose. To examine the relationships between worksite interpersonal influe nces and smoking and quitting behavior among adolescent workers. Design. The cross-sectional survey assessed factors influencing tobacco use behavior. Setting. During the fall of 1998, data were collected from 10 grocery store s in Massachusetts that were owned and managed by the same company. Subjects. Eligible participants included 474 working adolescents ages 15 to I8. Eighty-three percent of workers (n = 379) completed the survey. Measures. The self-report questionnaire assessed social influences, social norms, social support, friendship networks, stage of smoking and quitting b ehavior, employment patterns, and demographic factors. Results. Thirty-five percent of respondents were never smokers, 21% experim ental, 5% occasional, 18% regular and 23% former smokers. Using analysis of variance (ANOVA), results indicate that regular smokers were 30% more like ly than experimental or occasional smokers to report coworker encouragement to quit (p =.0002). Compared with regular smokers, never. smokers were 15% move likely to report greater nonacceptability of smoking(p =.01). chi (2) tests of association revealed no differences in friendship, networks by st age of smoking: Conclusions. These data provide evidence for the need to further explore so cial factors inside and outside the work environment that influence smoking and quitting behavior among working teens. Interpretations of the data are limited because of cross-sectional and self-report data collection methods used in one segment of the retail sector.