H. Ishikawa et al., Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement, AM J ORTHOD, 120(1), 2001, pp. 58-63
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
Developments in light-curing technology have led to the introduction of a p
lasma-are light-curing unit that delivers high-intensity output for faster
curing. The purposes of this study were to determine the shear bond strengt
hs of light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement cured with a plasma
-are light-curing unit and to evaluate the durability of the resultant bond
strength with thermal cycling. Comparisons were made between light-cured r
esin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and light-cured composite resin. Two l
ight-curing units were used in this study: a plasma-are light-curing unit a
nd a conventional light-curing unit. The mean shear bond strengths of light
-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement with the plasma-are and the co
nventional light-curing units were 20.3 MPa and 26.0 MPa, respectively. An
analysis of variance showed no statistically significant differences betwee
n the plasma-are and the conventional light-curing units. Light-cured resin
-reinforced glass ionomer cement and light-cured composite resin demonstrat
ed similar bond strengths and exhibited no statistical differences. There w
as no statistical difference in bond strength between the teeth that were t
hermal cycled and those that were not. Failure sites for the brackets bonde
d with light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement appeared to be pre
dominantly at the bracket-adhesive interface. The SDs of light-cured compos
ite resin were high for both light-curing units. Whereas the coefficients o
f variation for light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement ranged fr
om 20% to 30%, those of light-cured composite resin ranged from 40% to 60%.
The bond strength of light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement cur
ed with either a conventional light-curing unit or a plasma-are light-curin
g unit surpassed the clinically required threshold. The plasma-are light-cu
ring unit may be an advantageous alternative to the conventional light-curi
ng unit for orthodontic bracket bonding with both light-cured resin-reinfor
ced glass ionomer cement and light-cured composite resin.