Comparison between three intermittent catheterism: a prospective study in a group of 27 patients.

Citation
B. Mauroy et al., Comparison between three intermittent catheterism: a prospective study in a group of 27 patients., ANN UROL, 35(4), 2001, pp. 223-228
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ANNALES D UROLOGIE
ISSN journal
00034401 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
223 - 228
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4401(200107)35:4<223:CBTICA>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Clean intermittent catheterization has become a usual procedure in urologic practice. Self lubrificated catheters arenowadays accepted as the most eff icients. This randomised and prospective study compared tolerance and effic iency in a group of 27 patients of three well known catheters (12 charriere , straight): Flocath (Ruschcare(R)), Lofric (Astratech(R)) and Easycath (Co loplast(R)). The systematic comparison of this three catheters did not allo w to put in a prominent position one of these. The three catheters are extr emely close in terms of tolerance and performance. (C) 2001 Editions scient ifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.