The 15D is a generic, comprehensive, 15-dimensional, standardized, self-adm
inistered measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be use
d both as a profile and single index score measure. This paper examines the
acceptability, reliability, validity, discriminatory power and responsiven
ess to change of its health state descriptive system and valuation system a
nd presents some examples of applications, As a profile measure on roughly
comparable dimensions the 15D performs equally well as the Nottingham Healt
h Profile (NHP) and SF-20, in some respects even better, and clearly better
than EQ-5D, The remaining nine to ten dimensions of the 15D provide a larg
e reserve in terms of discriminatory power and responsiveness to change, Th
e valuation system is based on an application of the multiattribute utility
theory. The single index score (15D score) on a 0-1 scale, representing th
e overall HRQoL, is calculated from the health state descriptive system by
using a set of population-based preference or utility weights, The 15D scor
es are shown to be highly reliable, sensitive and responsive to change, gen
eralisable at least in Western-type societies, and particularly valid for d
eriving quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained for resource allocation
purposes. The instrument is recommended by the Washington Panel and is avai
lable in several languages for clinical economic evaluation and population
studies.