This paper reconsiders the argument that empirical estimations of aggregate
production functions may be interpreted merely as statistical artefact. Th
e reason is that Occam's razor, or Herbert Simon's principle of parsimony,
suggests that the aggregate production function, together with the side equ
ations derived from the usual neoclassical optimizing conditions, simply re
flect the underlying accounting identity that value added definitionally eq
uals the wage bill plus total profits. This argument is illustrated with re
spect to the empirical evidence presented by Arrow, Chenery, Minhas and Sol
ow (Review of Economics and Statistics, XLIII, 225-50, 1961) and which led
them to derive the Constant Elasticity of Substitution aggregate production
function. It is shown that their results are more parsimoniously explained
with reference to the underlying accounting identity than to any technolog
ical relationship.