M. Bhandari et al., Dorsal or ventral placement of the preputial/penile skin onlay flap for anterior urethral strictures: does it make a difference?, BJU INT, 88(1), 2001, pp. 39-43
Objective To report our experience in managing complex anterior urethral st
rictures with a dorsally/dorsolaterally placed penile/preputial vascularize
d nap, and to discuss the advantages of this procedure over a traditional v
entrally placed nap.
Patients and methods Between 1995 and 1999, 40 patients (mean age 40.5 year
s) with recurrent strictures of the pendulous and/or bulbar urethra were tr
eated with longitudinal penile/circumpenile nap substitution urethroplasty.
Nineteen patients underwent dorsal placement of the flap as an onlay (DO),
whereas 21 patients had a ventral onlay (VO). Five patients needed inferio
r pubectomy to facilitate high proximal placement of the flap.
Results Both groups had statistically similar ages, number of previous inte
rventions, stricture site, length and follow-up. After a median follow-up o
f 27.5 months, the stricture recurred in three (24%) of the VO and two (11%
) of the DO groups (P>0.05). One patient in the VO group required surgical
closure of the urethral fistula. Flap pseudo-diverticulum and/or sacculatio
n with postvoid dribble occurred in six patients in the VO and none in the
DO group (P=0.01).
Conclusions Dorsal placement of the pedicled nap is anatomically and functi
onally more appropriate than the traditional VO placement. DO preputial/pen
ile flap urethroplasty is a versatile procedure and can be applied even for
long anterior urethral strictures, including reconstruction of the meatus
and high proximal bulbar strictures.