BACKGROUND. It is said that most cases detected by neuroblastoma mass scree
ning at 6 months of age tend to have a favorable clinical course after a su
rgical resection either with or without mild chemotherapy. However, a feu c
ases have an unfavorable outcome. In the current study, the authors analyze
d the clinical and biologic characteristics for recurring neuroblastoma in
mass screening cases.
METHODS. In 245 cases detected through mass screening in the Kushu area in
Japan, the clinical data and biologic features (N-myc status, DNA ploidy, S
himada histology, neuron-specific enolase INSE), ferritin) were investigate
d, whereas, in particular, the data for recurring cases also were analyzed.
RESULTS. Of 245 cases, 28 tumors had one or more biologically unfavorable p
rognostic factors, and 6 patients experienced recurrence. Three of the six
patients with recurring disease underwent a complete resection of the prima
ry tumor, whereas three cases had undergone an incomplete resection of the
tumor. Regarding the initial chemotherapy, three cases received mild chemot
herapy, two cases received no chemotherapy, and one case had high-dose mult
idrug chemotherapy. Regarding biologic prognostic factors, four of six case
s with recurring disease had one or more unfavorable factors, whereas two c
ases had no unfavorable factors. Regarding the outcome after recurrence, fo
ur cases are CR, one case has a stable residual tumor, and one case died of
disease with N-myc amplification.
CONCLUSIONS. Most neuroblastomas detected by mass screening at 6 months of
age have biologically favorable factors. However, approximately 10% of the
cases had one or more unfavorable factors and thus might have a higher risk
of recurrence than the patients with no unfavorable factors. Conversely, s
ome cases with recurring disease had no unfavorable factors; however, the r
eason for this is still unclear. A long-term follow-up for mass screening c
ases is important, and it also might be necessary to research the establish
ed biologic factors and identify other new prognostic factors. (C) 2001 Ame
rican Cancer Society.