Y. Zaidi et al., Quinolone resistance in neutropenic patients: the effect of prescribing policy in the UK and Pakistan, CLIN LAB H, 23(1), 2001, pp. 39-42
Quinolones are increasingly used as prophylaxis in neutropenic patients to
prevent serious Gram-negative septicaemias but practice is not uniform beca
use of the controversial evidence as to their effectiveness. It is unclear
if they are of real benefit in patients with short episodes of neutropenia
such as those resulting from treatment for solid tumours and lymphomas. The
concern over the use of ciprofloxacin in such settings is the increasing d
evelopment of quinolone resistant Gram-negative bacteria. We have retrospec
tively analysed our bacterial isolate resistance patterns in the Queen Eliz
abeth Hospital (QE) and in the Haematology Department of the Aga Khan Hospi
tal (AKU), Pakistan where all patients would receive ciprofloxacin prophyla
xis when neutropenic. Seven out of 57 (12.2%) and 18 out of 55 (32.7%) Gram
-negative organisms isolated from blood cultures at the QE and AKU Haematol
ogy Departments, respectively, were resistant to ciprofloxacin (P < 0.01).
In the Birmingham community this was significantly lower (P < 0.01) (55 out
of 6423: 0.85%). We also showed a higher level of E. coli resistance at th
e AKU (18 out of 31: 58%) where ciprofloxacin use was more widespread than
at the QE (1 out of 11, P < 0.01). We conclude that ciprofloxacin should no
t be used indiscriminately.