Length of sedimentation reaction in undiluted blood (erythrocyte sedimentation rate): Variations with sex and age and reference limits

Citation
E. Piva et al., Length of sedimentation reaction in undiluted blood (erythrocyte sedimentation rate): Variations with sex and age and reference limits, CLIN CH L M, 39(5), 2001, pp. 451-454
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
14346621 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
451 - 454
Database
ISI
SICI code
1434-6621(200105)39:5<451:LOSRIU>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Although the length of sedimentation reaction in blood (LSRB) (commonly, bu t improperly called erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ESR) has long been used in clinical laboratories because it is simple and low-cost, its sensitivit y and specificity are unsatisfactory. Usually, the values are reported usin g the Westergren method with sodium citrate-anticoagulated specimens. We us ed a new procedure, the TEST1(TM), which measures the length of sedimentati on reaction in undiluted K(3)EDTA anticoagulated blood samples following IC SH (International Committee for Standardization in Haematology) recommendat ions. Samples obtained from 840 reference individuals (430 females and 410 males, mean age 44 and 46.5 years respectively, range 1 to 90 years) were u tilised to estimate the reference limits. The subjects, classified by sex, were subdivided into four statistically different age groups to determine t he reference limits (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles). Sex difference was stat istically significant in two age groups, from 14 to 50 (p<0.0001) and from 50 to 70 years (p<0.01). We did not observe significant sex difference with in the age bracket from 1 to 14 years and from 70 to 90 years. In both sexes LSRB values increased with age, in significant correlation wi th fibrinogen concentration (p<0.0001). and became significantly higher in subjects older than 70 compared to all the younger subjects (p<0.01 in fema les and p<0.02 in males). Thus, we defined adequate reference ranges in eld erly.