Caramazza and Costa, 2000 (Cognition 75, B51-B64) report three picture-word
interference experiments testing the response set mechanism of the WEAVER+ model of spoken word production. They argue that their findings are probl
ematic for WEAVER++ and that the model's architecture needs to be changed.
I show that there is no need to fundamentally modify the model. Instead, th
e findings of Caramazza and Costa, and all previous findings, are explained
by assuming that only a limited number of responses can be kept in short-t
erm memory and that memory improves with response repetition. (C) 2001 Else
vier Science B.V. All rights reserved.