Canadian university students (n = 48) solved simple addition problems in a
true/false verification task with equations in digit format (3 + 4 = 8) or
written English format (three + four = eight). Participants reported their
solution strategy (e.g. retrieval or calculation) after each trial. Reporte
d use of calculation strategies was much greater with word (41%) than digit
stimuli (26%), and this difference was exaggerated for numerically larger
problems. Word-format costs on reaction time (RT) were correspondingly grea
ter for large than for small problems, but this Format X Size RT effect was
bigger for true than for false equations. The results demonstrate that sur
face format affects central, rather than only peripheral, stages of cogniti
ve arithmetic. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.