Jm. Mcclintock et al., Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrates: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralogue group 1 genes, DEVELOPMENT, 128(13), 2001, pp. 2471-2484
As a result of a whole genome duplication event in the lineage leading to t
eleosts, the zebrafish has seven clusters of Hox patterning genes, rather t
han four, as described for tetrapod vertebrates. To investigate the consequ
ences of this genome duplication, we have carried nut a detailed comparison
of genes from a single Hox paralogue group, paralogue group (PG) 1, We hav
e analyzed the sequences, expression patterns and potential functions of al
l four of the zebrafish PG1 Hox genes, and compared our data with that avai
lable for the three mouse genes. As the basic functions of Hox genes appear
to be tightly constrained, comparison with mouse data has allowed us to id
entify specific changes in the developmental roles of Hox genes that have o
ccurred during vertebrate evolution. We have found variation in expression
patterns, amino acid sequences within functional domains, and potential gen
e functions both within the PG1 genes of zebrafish, and in comparison to mo
use PG1 genes, We observed novel expression patterns in the midbrain, such
that zebrafish hoxa1a and hoxc1a are expressed anterior to the domain tradi
tionally thought to be under Hox patterning control. The hoxc1a gene shows
significant coding sequence changes in known functional domains, which corr
elate with a reduced capacity to cause posteriorizing transformations. More
over, the hoxb1 duplicate genes have differing functional capacities, sugge
sting divergence after duplication. We also find that an intriguing functio
n 'shuffling' between paralogues has occurred, such that one of the zebrafi
sh hoxb1 duplicates, hoxb1b, performs the role in hindbrain patterning play
ed in mouse by the nonorthologous Hoxa1 gene.