This paper examines the cost of meeting the Kyoto Protocol commitments unde
r alternative assumptions regarding technology and technical change. Real G
DP is modeled as a function of the capital, labor, and energy inputs. The a
nalysis is based on data for 23 Annex 1 countries from 1965 to 1999. Two im
portant results emerge. First, the standard assumption of Hicks neutral tec
hnical change and time and scale independent output elasticities is not sup
ported by the data. Second, when technical change is allowed to be biased i
n favor of the energy and capital inputs, and when the output elasticities
vary with the level of factor use and over time, the loss in real GDP due t
o the Kyoto commitments: rises substantially. On average, the loss in real
GDP is one and a half times higher than obtained under the standard assumpt
ions. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.