Objectives. To understand how managed care plans use performance measures f
or quality improvement and to identify the strengths and weaknesses of curr
ently used standardized performance measures such as the Health Plan Employ
er Data and Information Set (HEDIS (R)) and the Consumer Assessment of Heal
th Plans (CAHPS (R)) survey.
Data Sources/Study Setting. Representatives (chief executive officers, medi
cal directors, and quality-improvement directors) from 24 health plans in f
our states were surveyed. The overall response rate was 58.3 percent, with
a mean of 1.8 respondents per plan.
Study Design. This exploratory qualitative research used a purposive sample
of respondents. Two study authors conducted separate one-hour tape-recorde
d telephone interviews with multiple respondents from each health plan.
Principal Findings. All managed care organizations interviewed use performa
nce measures for quality improvement but the degree and sophistication of u
se varies. Many of our respondent plans use performance measures to target
quality-improvement initiatives, evaluate current performance, establish go
als for quality improvement, identify the root cause of problems, and monit
or performance.
Conclusion. Performance measures are used for quality improvement in additi
on to informing external constituents, but additional research is needed to
understand how the benefits of measurement can be maximized.