Xd. Luo et al., Information sharing between heterogeneous uncertain reasoning models in a multi-agent environment: a case study, INT J APPRO, 27(1), 2001, pp. 27-59
The issue of information sharing and exchanging is one of the most importan
t issues in the areas of artificial intelligence and knowledge-based system
s, or even in the broader areas of computer and information technology. Thi
s paper deals with a special case of this issue by carrying out a case stud
y of information sharing between two well-known heterogeneous uncertain rea
soning models: the certainty factor model and the subjective Bayesian metho
d. More precisely, this paper discovers a family of exactly isomorphic tran
sformations between these two uncertain reasoning models. More interestingl
y, among isomorphic transformation functions in this family, different ones
can handle different degrees to which a domain expert is positive or negat
ive when performing such a transformation task. The direct motivation of th
e investigation lies in a realistic consideration. In the past, expert syst
ems exploited mainly these two models to deal with uncertainties. In other
words, a lot of stand-alone expert systems which use the two uncertain reas
oning models are available. If there is a reasonable transformation mechani
sm between these two uncertain reasoning models, we can use the Internet to
couple these pre-existing expert systems together so that the integrated s
ystems are able to exchange and share useful information with each other, t
hereby improving their performance through cooperation. Also, the issue of
transformation between heterogeneous uncertain reasoning models is signific
ant in the research area of multi-agent systems because different agents in
a multi-agent system could employ different expert systems with heterogene
ous uncertain reasonings for their action selections and the information sh
aring and exchanging is unavoidable between different agents. In addition,
we make clear the relationship between the certainty factor model and proba
bility theory. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.