The implications of contact with the mentor for preregistration nursing and midwifery students

Citation
Ml. Jones et al., The implications of contact with the mentor for preregistration nursing and midwifery students, J ADV NURS, 35(2), 2001, pp. 151-160
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
ISSN journal
03092402 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
151 - 160
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-2402(2001)35:2<151:TIOCWT>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Aim of the paper. To examine the extent to which preregistration nursing an d midwifery students have contact with their named mentor, and the implicat ions of this. Background/rationale. Mentorship has an important part to play in enabling preregistration nursing and midwifery students to gain the maximum benefit from clinical placements. Previous research has indicated that the benefits of mentorship to learners are related to the number of occasions on which the student and mentor work together. Design/methods. A research project commissioned by the Sheffield and North Trent College of Nursing and Midwifery (now the University of Sheffield Sch ool of Nursing and Midwifery) provided an opportunity to examine the extent to which their named mentors were available to Project 2000 students, and the implications of this. Students and their named mentors were asked to ke ep an activity diary for 1 week. The main objective was to collect activity data to inform an analysis of the costs and benefits of clinical placement s to service providers. This cost-benefit study has been published elsewher e. However, the data also cast light on the extent to which mentors were av ailable to students, and the implications of this, and it is these findings which are presented here. Results/findings. Students frequently worked shifts without their named men tors even though unrostered students often worked weekends, evening and nig ht shifts in order to maximize time spent with their mentors. In the mentor 's absence, other members of staff covered for some of their activities (in particular, direct and indirect supervision of students). However, student s whose named mentors were absent spent significantly less time than other students working with a qualified member of staff as a partner in giving ca re. Conclusions. It is suggested that the extent to which named mentors are una vailable to Project 2000 students may be detrimental to the education and p rofessional development of those students.