Aim of the paper. To examine the extent to which preregistration nursing an
d midwifery students have contact with their named mentor, and the implicat
ions of this.
Background/rationale. Mentorship has an important part to play in enabling
preregistration nursing and midwifery students to gain the maximum benefit
from clinical placements. Previous research has indicated that the benefits
of mentorship to learners are related to the number of occasions on which
the student and mentor work together.
Design/methods. A research project commissioned by the Sheffield and North
Trent College of Nursing and Midwifery (now the University of Sheffield Sch
ool of Nursing and Midwifery) provided an opportunity to examine the extent
to which their named mentors were available to Project 2000 students, and
the implications of this. Students and their named mentors were asked to ke
ep an activity diary for 1 week. The main objective was to collect activity
data to inform an analysis of the costs and benefits of clinical placement
s to service providers. This cost-benefit study has been published elsewher
e. However, the data also cast light on the extent to which mentors were av
ailable to students, and the implications of this, and it is these findings
which are presented here.
Results/findings. Students frequently worked shifts without their named men
tors even though unrostered students often worked weekends, evening and nig
ht shifts in order to maximize time spent with their mentors. In the mentor
's absence, other members of staff covered for some of their activities (in
particular, direct and indirect supervision of students). However, student
s whose named mentors were absent spent significantly less time than other
students working with a qualified member of staff as a partner in giving ca
re.
Conclusions. It is suggested that the extent to which named mentors are una
vailable to Project 2000 students may be detrimental to the education and p
rofessional development of those students.