Carotid stenosis - Factors affecting symptomatology

Citation
Cd. Liapis et al., Carotid stenosis - Factors affecting symptomatology, STROKE, 32(12), 2001, pp. 2782-2786
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
STROKE
ISSN journal
00392499 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
12
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2782 - 2786
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-2499(200112)32:12<2782:CS-FAS>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background and Purpose-The ability to predict future strokes in asymptomati c patients with carotid stenosis is currently limited. The management of sy mptomatic patients with < 50% stenosis is also debatable, In this context, we performed the following open prospective study to identify factors affec ting symptomatology in patients with carotid stenosis. Methods-During 1988-1997, 442 arteries with various degrees of stenosis wer e followed with the use of color Duplex ultrasonography every 6 months. The main outcome measures were development of symptoms related to the carotid territory and progression in the degree of stenosis. Results Of follow-up were analyzed in relation to the traditional risk fact ors for atherosclerosis as well as the ultrasonographic characteristics of the plaques. Statistical analysis was performed by multiple linear and Cox regression analysis. Results-Mean duration of follow-up was 44 months (rang e, 12 to 120 months). Significant progression of stenosis occurred in 18.5% of the cases and was more frequent in younger patients (P = 0.09), in pati ents with coronary artery disease (P = 0.02), and in patients with echoluce nt plaques (P = 0.02), In regard to clinical presentation, men (P = 0.07), hypertensives (P = 0.07), and patients with echolucent plaques (P = 0.09) s howed a trend toward higher frequency of stroke in their history. During th e follow-up period. neurological events developed in 12.4% of the cases and were associated with the severity of carotid disease (P < 0.001), history of neurological events (P = 0.02), progression of stenosis (P = 0.002). ech olucent plaques (P = 0.01). and hypertension (P = 0.02). Conclusions-Factors other than de-ree of stenosis and history of neurologic al events are also important in determining high-risk carotid plaque. In ou r study hypertension. echolucent plaques, and progressive lesions were asso ciated with an increased risk of neurological events. These factors should be taken into consideration in determining treatment strategies for carotid stenosis.