HYPOXIA MARKER LABELING IN TUMOR-BIOPSIES - QUANTIFICATION OF LABELING VARIATION AND CRITERIA FOR BIOPSY SECTIONING

Citation
De. Thrall et al., HYPOXIA MARKER LABELING IN TUMOR-BIOPSIES - QUANTIFICATION OF LABELING VARIATION AND CRITERIA FOR BIOPSY SECTIONING, Radiotherapy and oncology, 44(2), 1997, pp. 171-176
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
01678140
Volume
44
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
171 - 176
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-8140(1997)44:2<171:HMLIT->2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background and purpose: The error associated with using biopsy-based m ethods for assessing parameters reflective of the tumor microenvironme nt depends on the variability in distribution of the parameter through out the tumor and the biopsy sample. Some attention has been given to intratumoral distribution of parameters, but little attention has been given to their intrabiopsy distribution. We evaluated the intrabiopsy distribution of CCI-103F, a 2-nitroimidazole hypoxia marker. Material s and methods: The hypoxia marker CCI-103F was studied in dogs bearing spontaneous solid tumors. Two biopsies were taken from each of seven tumors, for a total of 14 biopsies. Biopsies were serially sectioned a nd four to six contiguous slides from each 100-150 mu m of the biopsy were used to formulate the best estimate of CCI-103F labeled area thro ughout the biopsy sample. One, two or four slides were then randomly s elected from each biopsy and the labeled area, based on this limited s ample, was compared to the estimate obtained from counting all availab le slides. Random sampling of slides was repeated 1000 times for each biopsy sample. Results: CCI-103F labeling variance throughout the biop sy decreased as the estimated overall labeled area in the biopsy decre ased. The error associated with estimating the overall labeled area in a biopsy from a randomly selected subset of slides decreased as the n umber of slides increased, and as the overall labeled area in the biop sy decreased. No minimally labeled biopsy was classified as unlabeled based on limited sampling. Conclusion. With regard to CCI-103F labelin g, quantification of the labeled area in four randomly selected slides from a biopsy can provide, in most biopsies, an estimate of the label ed area in the biopsy within an absolute range of +/-0.05. (C) 1997 El sevier Science Ireland Ltd.