M. Rees et al., LATE RESULTS JUSTIFY RESECTION FOR MULTIPLE HEPATIC METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL-CANCER, British Journal of Surgery, 84(8), 1997, pp. 1136-1140
Background Whilst hepatic resection is accepted for single colorectal
metastases, the role of surgery for multiple deposits is less certain.
This study reports results of a programme of aggressive resection of
hepatic metastases. Methods Of 150 hepatic resections for colorectal m
etastases, 107 patients have completed 1-9 years' follow-up for this a
ctuarial survival analysis. Indications for resection were disease con
fined to the liver, resectability of all metastases and preservation o
f sufficient hepatic parenchyma. Results One patient (1 per cent) died
after operation and six (6 per cent) suffered serious complications (
two surgical and four medical) but with full recovery. Patients who ha
d a radical resection (n = 89) had 1- and 5-year survival rates of 94
and 37 per cent respectively. A palliative group (n = 18) with disease
elsewhere (n = 9) or positive histological margins (n = 9) had corres
ponding survival rates of 56 and 6 per cent. Univariate analysis of th
e group who had radical surgery demonstrated that survival depended on
size of metastases (less than 7 cm) (P = 0.014), width of clear resec
tion margin (greater than 5 mm) (P = 0.004) and primary site (P = 0.01
0). Factors not affecting outcome were number of metastases, unilatera
l versus bilateral disease, synchronous versus metachronous spread, tu
mour differentiation and Dukes stage. Multivariate analysis demonstrat
ed independent survival advantage for small metastases (less than 7 cm
) (P = 0.002) and clear resection margin greater than 5 mm (P = 0.037)
. Conclusion Hepatic resection in selected patients with single and mu
ltiple colorectal hepatic metastases is justified.