Jm. Finch et al., FURTHER-STUDIES ON THE EFFICACY OF A LIVE VACCINE AGAINST MASTITIS CAUSED BY STREPTOCOCCUS-UBERIS, Vaccine, 15(10), 1997, pp. 1138-1143
Three groups of diary cows were immunized by subcutaneous (s.c.) admin
istration of a preparation of live Streptococcus uberis (strain 0140J)
and an intramammary infusion of a soluble surface extract derived fro
m same the bacteria. Animals in Groups 1 and 2 received two s.c. vacci
nations plus an intramammary inoculation. Animals in Group 3 received
two s.c. vaccinations but did not receive the intramammary infusion. I
n addition to the vaccinated animals, each group also contained two no
n-vaccinated (control) animals. All animals were challenged experiment
ally by intramammary infusion (in two quarters per animal) of ca 100 c
.f.u. of S. uberis (strain 0140J or C221) and monitored for clinical s
igns of disease, bacterial numbers in milk, somatic cell count in milk
, and daily milk yield for the following 10 days. Animals in Group 1 w
ere challenged with strain 0140J. Only one out of six challenged quart
ers of three vaccinated cows developed clinical disease compared to al
l (four out of four) quarters of non-vaccinated cows. Animals in Group
2 were challenged with strain C221. All challenged quarters of three
vaccinated (six out of six) and two non-vaccinated (four out of four)
cows developed clinical mastitis. Animals in Group 3 were challenged w
ith strain 0140J. Five out of eight quarters on four vaccinated co,vs
developed clinical mastitis but the onset was delayed in comparison wi
th that in both non-vaccinated cows in which four out of four challeng
ed quarters developed clinical mastitis. These results indicated that
vaccination with live S. uberis protects against challenge with the ho
mologous strain but was less effective against a heterologous strain.
Reduced protection,vas also seen when the intramammary booster was omi
tted. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.