Hb. Kitaoka et al., ANALYSIS OF LONGITUDINAL ARCH SUPPORTS IN STABILIZING THE ARCH OF THEFOOT, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (341), 1997, pp. 250-256
Two orthotic devices commonly prescribed as arch supports were studied
to evaluate their efficacy in stabilizing the foot. Fourteen cadaveri
c feet were mounted in a loading frame, and an axial load of 222, 445,
or 667 N was applied while three-dimensional positions of the talus,
calcaneus, navicular, and first metatarsal were monitored with a magne
tic tracking system. Feet were tested with and without the use of two
commonly prescribed arch supports. The two indices used to assess arch
stabilization were arch height and joint rotation. Joint rotations co
nsistently increased on load application. Significant differences were
observed with Inserts 1 and 2 in metatarsal talar abduction, dorsifle
xion and eversion, calcaneal talar eversion, and talar tibial dorsifle
xion. Arch height significantly increased with both inserts. Contrary
to previously published results, the arch supports that were studied p
rovided measurable improvement in arch stability in a simulated standi
ng at ease position.