The current increase in the prevalence of food allergies appears to ha
ve several causes including better screening, improved diagnosis and c
hanges in both the techniques used by food manufacturers and eating ha
bits. Labial food challenge (LFC)is simple, rapid to perform and is as
sociated with only low risks of systemic reaction. It is thus an appea
ling alternative to the oral food challenge (OFC) for pediatric use. W
e report a series of 202 LFC performed over two years in 142 children
with food allergy suspected from the case history, positive skin prick
test and specific serum IgE assays: 156 LFC were positive; and 46 neg
ative, followed by positive single-blind, placebo-controlled food chal
lenges (SB-PCFC). The foods provoking reactions were egg white (75 cas
es), peanut (60 cases), mustard (23 cases), cow's mill; (13 cases), co
d (8 cases), kiwi fruit, shrimp (4 cases each), chicken, peanut oil (3
cases each), hazel nuts (2 cases), and snails, apple, fennel, garlic,
chilli peppers, pepper, and duck (1 case each). LFC positivity was mo
stly (89.7% of cases) manifested as a labial edema with contiguous urt
icaria. There were systemic reactions in 4.5% of cases: generalized ur
ticaria, hoarseness and rapid-onset and generalized eczema. The 46 inf
ants with negative LFC results had positive SB-PCFC. The reactions wer
e in 34 cases generalized urticaria, 10 cases asthma attacks, 2 cases
early and generalized eczema, and in one case general anaphylactic sho
ck. The sensitivity of the LFC was 77%. The LFC was easy to perform wi
th children. Positive results indicate the presence of food allergy, b
ut negative results require further investigations preferably double-b
lind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).