B. Kunz et al., CLINICAL VALIDATION AND GUIDELINES FOR THE SCORAD INDEX - CONSENSUS REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN TASK-FORCE ON ATOPIC-DERMATITIS, Dermatology, 195(1), 1997, pp. 10-19
Background: We have previously reported how-the SCORAD index was desig
ned, This cumulative index combines objective (extent and intensity of
lesions) and subjective (daytime pruritus and sleep loss) criteria, A
ims: To study interobserver variability in scoring for objective SCORA
D criteria and to optimize the scoring guidelines, Material and Method
s: Three scoring sessions were organized in 1993-1994 in Hamburg, Bord
eaux and Rotterdam totalizing 19 patients (14 children and 5 adults) a
nd 23 physicians, among whom 12 participated in at least 2 scoring ses
sions; 169 evaluation sheets have been processed using the SCORAD File
Marker Pro software. at each session, total body photographs and clos
e-up views were taken of each patient, and this material was reviewed
at the final evaluation, Results: The extent of lesions according to t
he rule of nines showed interobserver variability mostly for patients
with lesions of moderate intensity involving 20-60% of body surface, I
ntensity items were scored with more consistency overall, but variatio
ns subsided especially for oozing/crusts and lichenifications, Low and
high scorer profiles and the benefit of training were noted, Conclusi
ons: This study has allowed to optimize clinical scoring using the SCO
RAD system, A proposal has been made to grade the severity of atopic d
ermatitis according to objective criteria in three groups for inclusio
n in clinical trials. The SCORAD index remains the major criterion for
follow-up in trials.