Bs. Zeidan et al., LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIOPLASTY - A COMMUNITY HOSPITALS EXPERIENCE, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 42(4), 1997, pp. 226-230
Although controversial, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become
increasingly popular among surgeons. The overall advantages of this p
rocedure over conventional hernia repair have not as yet been substant
iated. One hundred and three consecutive laparoscopic, transabdominal,
preperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs in 91 patients were evaluated r
etrospectively. Patients' satisfaction was assessed using the Visick g
rading system. The mean follow-up was 18.3 months. One case was conver
ted to an open procedure, Eighty-eight patients (91%) were discharged
on the day of surgery. Eighty-seven patients (96%) were satisfied with
the operation (Visick grades I & II). Twenty-nine patients who previo
usly underwent a traditional open herniorraphy stated that they would
have preferred the laparoscopic method if they had the choice. Early c
omplications included wound infection (n = 1), urinary retention (n =
1) and intestinal obstruction necessitating a laparotomy (n = 1). All
patients were ambulating without significant pain after a mean of 7.6
days, and returned to work after 2.4 weeks on average. There was one c
ase of recurrence, In conclusion, patients are satisfied with the lapa
roscopic hernioplasty technique, which is associated with a low morbid
ity and short term recurrence rate. Laparoscopic hernioplasty should b
e considered a viable and valuable alternative to the open method. It
appears especially attractive for recurrent or bilateral hernias.