PERIPHERAL-ZONE TREATMENTS FOR PLUM CURCULIO MANAGEMENT - VALIDATION IN COMMERCIAL APPLE ORCHARDS

Citation
C. Vincent et al., PERIPHERAL-ZONE TREATMENTS FOR PLUM CURCULIO MANAGEMENT - VALIDATION IN COMMERCIAL APPLE ORCHARDS, Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 84(1), 1997, pp. 1-8
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology
ISSN journal
00138703
Volume
84
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1 - 8
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-8703(1997)84:1<1:PTFPCM>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Peripheral applications of organophosphate insecticides were evaluated as an alternative strategy for controlling adult plum curculio, Conot rachelus nenuphar Herbst (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in four commercia l orchards in Quebec, Canada. Each orchard was partitioned into a refe rence and an experimental plot to compare the classical full plot trea tment with a peripheral treatment alternative. The experimental plots were divided into five zones, i.e. central, North, South, West and Eas t. Peripheral zones were defined as the first five rows of apple trees (or 20 m wide). Plum curculio adults were monitored weekly by limb ta pping. Fresh oviposition scars were evaluated by examining 20 fruitlet s per tree on each outermost tree in the peripheral zone and 20 fruit on 25 trees in the central zone. Azinphosmethyl treatments were carrie d out in the zones where more than 1% fruitlets bore fresh oviposition al scars. Fruit damage was mostly (92%) found in the peripheral zones. Plum curculio damage at harvest varied from 0.0 to 0.7% and from 0.0 to 0.8% in the experimental and reference plots respectively. Total in sect damage on fruit at harvest varied from 1.3 to 3.8% in the experim ental plots, and from 0.4 to 5.0% in the reference plots. In 1991, the re were no significant differences between population indices of the s potted tentiform leafminer, the apple aphid, leafroller species and ci cadellids in the peripheral versus central zones. In the experimental plots, populations of woolly apple aphid, two-spotted spider mite and apple rust mite were significantly higher in peripheral zones than in the central zones. In 1992, there were no significant differences betw een population indices of peripheral versus central zones for both exp erimental and reference plots. All localities and years pooled, periph eral zones of experimental plots received 1.22 insecticide treatments, against 1.29 for reference plots. However, central zones of experimen tal plots received 0.38 insecticide treatments, against 1.13 for refer ence plots. Assuming a 20 m peripheral zone and a 10 ha square orchard , the percent reduction in insecticides would be ca. 75%.