C. Vincent et al., PERIPHERAL-ZONE TREATMENTS FOR PLUM CURCULIO MANAGEMENT - VALIDATION IN COMMERCIAL APPLE ORCHARDS, Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 84(1), 1997, pp. 1-8
Peripheral applications of organophosphate insecticides were evaluated
as an alternative strategy for controlling adult plum curculio, Conot
rachelus nenuphar Herbst (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in four commercia
l orchards in Quebec, Canada. Each orchard was partitioned into a refe
rence and an experimental plot to compare the classical full plot trea
tment with a peripheral treatment alternative. The experimental plots
were divided into five zones, i.e. central, North, South, West and Eas
t. Peripheral zones were defined as the first five rows of apple trees
(or 20 m wide). Plum curculio adults were monitored weekly by limb ta
pping. Fresh oviposition scars were evaluated by examining 20 fruitlet
s per tree on each outermost tree in the peripheral zone and 20 fruit
on 25 trees in the central zone. Azinphosmethyl treatments were carrie
d out in the zones where more than 1% fruitlets bore fresh oviposition
al scars. Fruit damage was mostly (92%) found in the peripheral zones.
Plum curculio damage at harvest varied from 0.0 to 0.7% and from 0.0
to 0.8% in the experimental and reference plots respectively. Total in
sect damage on fruit at harvest varied from 1.3 to 3.8% in the experim
ental plots, and from 0.4 to 5.0% in the reference plots. In 1991, the
re were no significant differences between population indices of the s
potted tentiform leafminer, the apple aphid, leafroller species and ci
cadellids in the peripheral versus central zones. In the experimental
plots, populations of woolly apple aphid, two-spotted spider mite and
apple rust mite were significantly higher in peripheral zones than in
the central zones. In 1992, there were no significant differences betw
een population indices of peripheral versus central zones for both exp
erimental and reference plots. All localities and years pooled, periph
eral zones of experimental plots received 1.22 insecticide treatments,
against 1.29 for reference plots. However, central zones of experimen
tal plots received 0.38 insecticide treatments, against 1.13 for refer
ence plots. Assuming a 20 m peripheral zone and a 10 ha square orchard
, the percent reduction in insecticides would be ca. 75%.