M. Alagiri et al., THE STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY - IMPLICATIONS AS AN ADJUNCTIVE PROCEDURE FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER, British Journal of Urology, 80(2), 1997, pp. 243-246
Objectives To evaluate the utility of staging pelvic lymphadenectomy a
nd to identify factors associated with nodal metastases in which a nod
e dissection would be of clinical benefit. Patients and methods A retr
ospective analysis (1989-1993) was performed on 303 consecutive patien
ts who underwent staging bilateral modified pelvic lymph node dissecti
on for clinically localized prostate cancer. Multivariate logistic reg
ression analysis was used to evaluate age, race, clinical stage, prost
ate-specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score for predicting noda
l metastases.Results Twenty-eight patients had nodal metastases, givin
g an overall prevalence of 9.2%. PSA and Gleason score (both P<0.001)
were significantly predictive of nodal involvement when combined or as
independent variables. Relative to PSA and Gleason score, the patient
s' age, race and clinical stage were less relevant. Sensitivity analys
is determined that combining a PSA of greater than or equal to 20 ng/m
L (normal 0-4) and a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 8 gave
a negative predictive value of 92% with a specificity of 99%, a positi
ve predictive value of 67% and an overall accuracy of 91% for predicti
ng nodal metastases. Conclusion From this data, lymph node metastases
are unlikely in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who
have a PSA of < 20 ng/mL and a Gleason score <8, and that a pelvic ly
mph node dissection as an adjunctive procedure should be avoided in su
ch individuals.