Objective To evaluate variables for the prediction of lymph node metas
tases in carcinoma of the penis, using a recently proposed modified tu
mour-staging system that combines the histological degree of different
iation and extent of local invasion of the primary tumour. Patients an
d methods Thirty-five patients with squamous carcinoma of the penis an
d histo-or cytological staging of the inguinal lymph nodes were review
ed, A clinical TNM staging system was used in which the size (diameter
) of the primary tumour and the clinical extent of invasion were consi
dered, Subsequently, the tumours were also staged according to a modif
ied T-system in which the histological degree of differentiation and p
athological extent of tumour invasion were combined. Results Penectomy
was performed in 34 patients (partial amputation in 20 and radical pe
nectomy in 17). Inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 31 patients
and in four the presence of lymph node metastases was confirmed by asp
iration cytology. Using the clinical TNM staging system, lymph node me
tastases were histo-or cytologically present in no patients with T1, i
n five of 19 with T2, in 10 of 13 with T3 and in both patients with T4
tumours. Lymph node metastases were present in two of eight patients
without clinically palpable inguinal nodes, in three of 14 with nodes
clinically thought to be infective and in 11 of 12 nodes clinically co
nsidered to be malignant. Lymph node metastases were present in five o
f 17 patients with grade 1, in nine of 13 with grade 2 and in three of
five with grade 3 tumours. Using the modified histological T-staging
system (T1=grade 1-2, invasive through dermis; T2=any grade, invasion
of corpus spongiosum or cavernosum; T3=any grade, invasion of urethra;
T4=grade 3, regardless of invasion) lymph node metastases were presen
t in one of nine patients with T1, in eight of 16 with T2, in all five
with T3 and in three of five with T4 tumours. Conclusion The modified
T-staging system, which combines histological differentiation with pa
thological extent of invasion, provided the best predictive distinctio
n between T1 and T2-4 tumours, indicating that lymphadenectomy can be
avoided in T1 tumours, but should be performed in all patients with T2
-4 tumours. We recommend bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy 6-8 weeks
after penectomy in such patients.