The aim of preoperative risk analysis is to reduce postoperative morbi
dity and mortality by identification of compromised organ function whi
ch can be improved by targeted preoperative measures and problem-orien
ted postoperative therapy. Ideally, therefore, preoperative risk asses
sment, influences the timing of the surgical procedure, the choice of
the surgical approach, and the postoperative management. Identificatio
n of preexisting relevant disorders that may influence the postoperati
ve course is an essential prerequisite of risk analysis. While preoper
ative risk analysis today gains in importance with the increasing exte
nt of elective surgical procedures, preoperative risk evaluation still
plays a minor role in the emergency situation when the given patient-
dependent risk usually has to be accepted. Objective risk evaluation d
epends on the general and nutritional status, the pulmonary, cardio-va
scular, hepatic, and renal function, and the cooperation of the patien
t. These factors, however, clearly have to be seen in relation to the
type and extent of the planned surgical procedure. The selection of ad
ditional tests of organ function, exceeding the standard tests require
d prior to any surgical intervention, must be guided by the extent of
the planned surgical procedure, the physiologic alterations associated
with the surgical procedure, and the suspected underlying organ dysfu
nction. Generally accepted multifactorial classification systems to id
entify patients at risk for a wide spectrum of surgical procedures are
currently not available. Using the model of esophagectomy in patients
with esophageal cancer we could, however, demonstrate that a quantita
tive assessment of the peri-and postoperative risk based on preoperati
vely available physiologic parameters is possible and markedly reduces
postoperative mortality when applied prospectively. The development a
nd validation of similar risk-score systems for other surgical procedu
res should be considered.